4.1 Article

Comparing the Scholarship Contributions of Five Disciplines to the Occupational Licensure Literature Indexed in Web of Science™

期刊

JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 4-13

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S2155-8256(19)30142-5

关键词

Bibliometrics; Nursing Now campaign; occupational licensure; professional regulation; sustainable development goals; universal health coverage; Web of Science

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To provide a synopsis of the occupational licensure literature and how scholarship contributions (i.e., research, reviews, book chapters, conference proceedings, editorials, and other) compare across the five largest contributory disciplines indexed in the Web of Science (TM) (WOS) bibliographic database. Methods: Data were extracted in May 2019 from the WOS (Clarivate Analytics) bibliographic database and analyzed using Histcite and VosViewer. Bibliographic information was identified using a standard keyword and Boolean operator search and was downloaded into a plain text ANSI file from WOS. Results: A total of 507 pieces of content were identified. The top five contributing disciplines were nursing (68), law (68), economics (59), education (35), and medicine (34). The first item indexed appeared in 1931, and for the next 40 years, a handful of content items were published sporadically. Between 1971 to 2005, scholarship on occupational licensure was initiated consistently with small numbers of articles being authored each year. Between 2005 and May 2019, there was a rapid growth in scholarship. Conclusions: Differences in the focus and volume of published content were observed, with nursing, law, and economics being the most prolific disciplines. The findings of this study add weight to the call for the nursing profession to be more actively involved in policy discussions, as they have far greater potential to bring evidence to the decision-making table.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据