4.8 Article

Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.002

关键词

Delphi; Review; Methodology; Judgment; Expert; Consensus

资金

  1. European Agency for Fundamental Rights

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides a practical, systematic approach to the design and delivery of a Delphi survey. We prescribe a sequence of six steps to do with (i) setting up the Delphi process - including selecting respondents and generating a requisite number of focal issues, (ii) software/delivery choice, (iii) developing question items and response scales, (iv) providing feedback between a requisite number of Delphi rounds, (v) preventing and dealing with panellist drop out, and (vi) analysing and presenting the Delphi yield. At each step, the Delphi administrator has a range of choice options and we provide discussion of the pros and cons of each option - in order that the overall design and delivery of a particular Delphi survey is both well-founded and defensible.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据