期刊
RESOURCES POLICY
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101453
关键词
Coal mine accident; Accident analysis; Systems approach; STAMP; FRAM; 2-4 model
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [71704176]
- Think Tank of Energy Mining Economy (2018 Double First-Class Initiative Project for Cultural Evolution and Creation of CUMT) [2018WHCC01]
- Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Universities [2018ZDJD-B009]
- State Key Program of National Social Science Foundation of China [19AGL030]
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019CXNL07]
Coal mine accidents are often caused by the coupling of multiple factors rather than by a single factor. Therefore, explaining the nonlinear and coupling characteristics in accidents by using traditional accident theory is hard. To cope with the safety challenges caused by the extensive use of digital components and the construction of complex systems, incorporating the idea of system engineering into accident analysis is deemed effective. First, this paper introduces the basic principles and analysis steps of the Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP), Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) and 2-4 models and then applies the three models to the eight coal mine accidents. Finally, the three models are compared based on their characteristics, analysis processes and analysis results. The results show that the accident causes identified by the three methods cover the main causes in the accident investigation report, and new causes were identified. However, the results of the STAMP and FRAM models are more comprehensive and systematic, but the model characteristics and analysis processes are more complex, whereas the results of the 2-4 model analysis are relatively broad, but the analysis process is simple and easy to understand. Therefore, the study suggests that although the choice of accident causing model depends on the user's knowledge level or accident type, the STAMP and FRAM models are more suitable for analyzing a small number of complex coal mine accidents, while the 2-4 model is more advantageous in the analysis of large number of accidents.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据