4.8 Article

Manipulating Interfacial Nanostructure to Achieve High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

SMALL METHODS
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201900261

关键词

all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries; interfacial nanostructure design; sulfide electrolytes

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canada Research Chair Program (CRC)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Ontario Research Fund (ORF)
  5. China Automotive Battery Research Institute Co., Ltd.
  6. Glabat Solid-State Battery Inc.
  7. Canada Light Source (CLS) at University of Saskatchewan
  8. Interdisciplinary Development Initiatives (IDI) by Western University
  9. University of Western Ontario
  10. Mitacs Elevate Postdoctoral Fellowship
  11. Mitacs Accelerate Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries (ASSLIBs) have gained substantial attention worldwide due to their intrinsic safety and high energy density. However, the large interfacial resistance of ASSLIBs, which originates from the interfacial reactions and inferior electrode-electrolyte contact between electrodes and solid electrolytes, dramatically constrains their electrochemical performance. Here a dual shell interfacial nanostructure is rationally designed to enable high-performance ASSLIBs, in which the inner shell LiNbO3 suppresses the interfacial reactions while the outer shell Li10GeP2S12 enables intimate electrode-electrolyte contact. As a result, the dual shell structured Li10GeP2S12@LiNbO3@LiCoO2 exhibits a high initial specific capacity of 125.8 mAh g(-1) (1.35 mAh cm(-2)) with an initial Coulombic efficiency of 90.4% at 0.1 C and 87.7 mAh g(-1) at 1 C. More importantly, in situ X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy was performed for the first time to reveal the interfacial reactions between Li10GeP2S12 and LiCoO2. This dual shell nanostructure demonstrates an ideal interfacial configuration for realizing high-performance ASSLIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据