4.0 Review

Nanozyme Based Detection of Heavy Metal Ions and its Challenges: A Minireview

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYSIS AND TESTING
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 206-218

出版社

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s41664-019-00110-2

关键词

Nanozymes; Enzyme-mimic activity; Heavy metal ions; Nanomaterials; Sensing

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [107-2622-B-182001-CC2, 107-2113-M-019-004-MY3, 107-2622-M-019-001-CC2, 107-2627-M-007-007-MY3]
  2. University System of Taipei Joint Research Program [USTP-NTUT-NTOU-108-02]
  3. Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naznozymes have become an important alternative to natural enzymes for many sensing applications, due to their relatively high stability, easy synthesis, and cost-effectiveness. Nanozyme-based assays, especially paper-based assays are portable, and therefore, are convenient for use in field operations, especially in remote parts of the world. Decreasing water levels, depletion of water resources, and large scale mining create the need for rapid detection of heavy metal ions in various water samples. In comparison with traditional methods of heavy metal ion detection, nanozyme-based systems enable rapid and cheap screening on the spot with a very simple instrument such as a UV-Vis absorption spectrophotometer. The sensing mechanism of a nanozyme-based sensor is highly dependent on its surface properties. They often encounter selectivity issues, unlike natural enzyme-based assays. Therefore, different types of target recognition and inhibition/enhancement mechanisms have been reported to achieve high selectivity. In this short review, we mainly focus our discussion on various interaction of the heavy metal ions with the nanozyme, and their responses towards the catalytic activity in the sensing of target metal ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据