4.8 Review

Rhodols - synthesis, photophysical properties and applications as fluorescent probes

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 48, 期 20, 页码 5242-5265

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cs00166b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for Polish Science [FNP TEAM POIR.04.04.00-00-4232/17-00, FNP TEAM POIR.04.04.00-00-3CF4/16-00]
  2. Global Research Laboratory Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Korea [2014K1A1A2064569]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014K1A1A2064569] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formal replacement of one dialkylamino group in rhodamines with a hydroxyl group transforms them into rhodols. This apparently minor difference is not as small as one may think; rhodamines belong to the cyanine family whereas rhodols belong to merocyanines. Discovered in the late 19th century, rhodols have only very recently begun to gain momentum in the field of advanced fluorescence imaging. This is in part due to the increased understanding of their photophysical properties, and new methods of synthesis. Rationalization of how the nature and arrangement of polar substituents around the core affect the photophysical properties of rhodols is now possible. The emergence of so-called p-expanded and heteroatom-modified rhodols has also allowed their fluorescence to be bathochromically shifted into regions applicable for biological imaging. This review serves to outline applicable synthetic strategies for the synthesis of rhodols, and to highlight important structure-property relationships. In the first part of this Review, various synthetic methods leading to rhodols are presented, followed by structural considerations and an overview of photophysical properties. The second part of this review is entirely devoted to the applications of rhodols as fluorescent reporters in biological imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据