4.5 Article

Neuroplasticity Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

期刊

出版社

J O S P T
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7003

关键词

brain; knee; motor control; neuromuscular control; neuroscience; rehabilitation; sports injury

资金

  1. National Athletic Trainers' Association Foundation
  2. National Strength and Conditioning Association Foundation
  3. Ohio State College of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury may result in neuroplastic changes due to lost mechanoreceptors of the ACL and compensations in neuromuscular control. These alterations are not completely understood Assessing brain function after ACL injury and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with functional magnetic resonance imaging provides a means to address this gap in knowledge. OBJECTIVE: To compare differences in brain activation during knee flexion/extension in persons who have undergone ACLR and in matched controls. METHODS: Fifteen participants who had undergone left ACLR (38.13 +/- 27.16 months postsurgery) and 15 healthy controls matched on age, sex, height, mass, extremity dominance, education level, sport participation, and physical activity level participated. Functional magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained during a unilateral knee motor task consisting of repeated cycles of knee flexion and extension. RESULTS: Participants who had undergone ACLR had increased activation in the contralateral motor cortex, lingual gyrus, and ipsilateral secondary somatosensory area and diminished activation in the ipsilateral motor cortex and cerebellum when compared to healthy matched controls. CONCLUSION: Brain activation for knee flexion/extension motion may be altered following ACLR. The ACLR brain activation profile may indicate a shift toward a visual-motor strategy as opposed to a sensory-motor strategy as opposed to a sensory-motor strategy to engage in knee movement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据