4.6 Article

The effect of MR1 ligand glyco-analogues on mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cell activation

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 17, 期 40, 页码 8992-9000

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ob01436e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [13/049]
  2. JSPS [JP 16K08740, 26293373]
  3. MEXT [26110009]
  4. AMED [JP17gm0910010, JP17ak0101070]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26293373] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are a subset of recently identified innate-like T lymphocytes that appear to play an important role in many pathologies ranging from viral and bacterial infection, to autoimmune disorders and cancer. MAIT cells are activated via the presentation of ligands by MR1 on antigen presenting cells to the MAIT T cell receptor (TCR), however few studies have explored the effects of systematic changes to the ligand structure on MR1 binding and MAIT cell activation. Herein, we report on the first study into the effects of changes to the sugar motif in the known MAIT cell agonists 7-hydroxy-6-methyl-8-D-ribityllumazine (RL-6-Me-7-OH) and 5-(2-oxopropylideneamino)-6-D-ribityl-aminouracil (5-OP-RU). Tetramer staining of MAIT cells revealed that the absence of the 2'-hydroxy group on the sugar backbone of lumazines improved MR1-MAIT TCR binding, which could be rationalised using computational docking studies. Although none of the lumazines activated MAIT cells, all 5-OP-RU analogues showed significant MAIT cell activation, with several analogues exhibiting comparable activity to 5-OP-RU. Docking studies with the 5-OP-RU analogues revealed different interactions between the sugar backbone and MR1 and the MAIT TCR compared to those observed for the lumazines and confirmed the importance of the 2'-hydroxy group for ligand binding and activity. Taken together, this information will assist in the development of future potent agonists and antagonists of MAIT cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据