4.6 Article

Ceria imparts superior low temperature activity to nickel catalysts for CO2 methanation

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 20, 页码 5636-5650

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cy01186b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [21890762]
  2. NSFC-NRCT joint project [51661145012]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2017-K08]
  4. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-SLH022]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation/China [21706258]
  6. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2018-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide methanation is well known to achieve the catalytic conversion of the CO2 molecule into value-added chemicals. At present, the important challenge is the development of efficient methanation catalysts at low reaction temperature. In this study, Ni-Al layered double hydroxides (LDHs) were used as catalyst precursors and modified by CeO2 for CO2 methanation. By the optimization of CeO2 loading, the reaction activity was improved, especially at low temperature. Among the prepared catalysts, the NiAl-MO/CeO2-5 catalyst exhibited the highest catalytic activity with a CO2 conversion of 91% at 250 degrees C. The addition of CeO2 was beneficial to the formation of small particles with good dispersion and provided appropriate basic sites and oxygen vacancies, which were conducive to the catalytic performance. DFT calculation and in situ DRIFTS results further verified that the catalyst with an appropriate amount of CeO2 was favorable for CO2 adsorption and conversion. The reaction mechanism results demonstrated that the high amount of formate intermediate species can accelerate the reaction and a certain amount of ceria in the catalyst could provide a suitable metal-support interaction, which was beneficial for CO2 methanation. The LDH as a catalyst precursor integrated with CeO2 shows a promising effect on CO2 methanation at low temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据