4.2 Article

Nomenclature of primary amenorrhea: A proposal document of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology committee for the redefinition of primary amenorrhea

期刊

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 1738-1742

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.13442

关键词

delayed menarche; delayed menstruation; late menarche; nomenclature; primary amenorrhea

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H04679, 16K15701, 16H05469, 16K15700] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimThe aim of this study was to provide medical terms to describe the condition of a girl who should be evaluated for primary amenorrhea in order to facilitate intervention at an appropriate time. MethodsWe performed a literature and clinical guidelines search for recent practices with regard to menarche and discussed relevant cases that had been experienced by committee members. Additionally, we theoretically reviewed medical terms defined in the Glossary Book of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Japan (Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3rd edition). ResultsThe committee for the redefinition of primary amenorrhea proposed the introduction of two terms and the deletion of one term that had been defined by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, instead of changing the age definition of primary amenorrhea. Delayed menarche' was introduced to describe a condition in which a girl has never experienced cyclic menstruation (menarche) by 15-17 years of age. Late menarche' was also introduced to describe a condition in which a girl has experienced menarche at 15 years of age or older. Delayed menstruation,' which was defined as a condition in which a girl experiences menarche at 15-18 years of age, was deleted. ConclusionThe new terms delayed menarche' and late menarche' were introduced, and the term delayed menstruation' was deleted. The new system might help in the early detection and appropriate treatment of primary amenorrhea.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据