3.9 Article

Variants in Chemosensory Genes Are Associated with Picky Eating Behavior in Preschool-Age Children

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRIGENETICS AND NUTRIGENOMICS
卷 10, 期 3-4, 页码 84-92

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000478857

关键词

Children; Picky eating; Chemosensory perception; Taste; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Genetics

资金

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture [2011-67001-30101]
  2. Illinois Council for Agriculture Research
  3. University of Illinois Health and Wellness Initiative
  4. United States Department of Agriculture [Hatch 793-328]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Picky eating is prevalent among preschoolers and is associated with risk of both underweight and overweight. Although differences in taste perception may be due to genetic variation, it is unclear whether these variations are related to picky eating behavior. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 5 candidate genes related to chemosensory perception with picky eating behavior and adiposity in a cohort of preschool-aged children. Methods: Parents of 2-to 5-year-old non-Hispanic white preschoolers (n = 153) responded to survey questions on demographics, and information regarding their child's breastfeeding history and picky eating behavior. Height and weight were measured to calculate body mass index (BMI) z-scores using standard growth charts, and saliva was collected for genotyping. Generalized linear models were used to examine associations between picky eating behavior and BMI z-scores with genetic variation. Results: When controlling for child age, sex, breastfed status, and parent education level, SNPs in TAS2R38 (rs713598) and CA6 (rs2274327) were associated with picky eating behavior in children. There was no association between SNPs and BMI z-scores. Conclusion: Genes related to chemosensory perception may play a role in children's picky eating behavior. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据