4.5 Article

US Estimates of Pediatric Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Clinical Care and Research Planning

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 34, 期 12, 页码 2019-2026

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4774

关键词

pediatrics; research and development; research design; spinal cord injuries

资金

  1. Roessler Research Scholarship from The Ohio State University College of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to provide accurate estimates and characterizations of children with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) and for the subset that are appropriate for inclusion in clinical trials. We identified children <18 years of age with SCI International Classifications of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification Codes (ICD-9-CM codes) from the 2006, 2009, and 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database. We excluded those with late effects, transfers to other hospitals, unspecified injury levels, and hospital stays <48h. We then used conventional rationale to identify children who were eligible for SCI clinical trials. Over 3 years, 2484 children had SCI ICD-9-CM codes; 1342 had coding consistent with true SCI and 706 satisfied clinical trial inclusion criteria, yielding national estimates of 2013 and 1062, respectively. Of children with clinical trial eligible SCI, injuries were more common in the cervical region (66.1%), males (65.5%), older children (51.1% were 16-17 years old), and the South (49.8%). The majority were treated at urban teaching hospitals (84.6%); however, only 20.3% were treated at pediatric-specific centers. Of the 445 sample hospitals treating children with SCI, 66.3% treated just 1 child in the 3-year period. Children eligible for SCI clinical trials represented less than one third of children with SCI ICD-9-CM codes. These children were regionally localized to the South, with few receiving treatment at pediatric-specific centers or centers that frequently care for children with SCI. These findings highlight the importance of carefully assessing the national distribution of children with SCI, so that resources are appropriately allocated to optimize clinical care and research outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据