3.8 Proceedings Paper

Effects of Diffusion MRI Model and Harmonization on the Consistency of Findings in an International Multi-cohort HIV Neuroimaging Study

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL DIFFUSION MRI (CDMRI 2018)
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 203-215

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-05831-9_17

关键词

HIV; Multi-site; Harmonization; TDF; Diffusion MRI; ComBat; DTI

资金

  1. BD2K Initiative [U54 EB020403, P41 EB015922, K23MH095661]
  2. Clinical and Translational Research Center Grants [UCLA: K23MH095661, UL1RR033176, UL1TR000124]
  3. Serbia: Provincial Secretariat for Higher Education and Scientific Research [114-451-2730/2016-02]
  4. Brown and ARCH [R01MH074368]
  5. Lifespan/Tufts/Brown Center for AIDS Research [P30 AI042853, P01AA019072]
  6. [MH19535]
  7. [UNSW: NHMRCAPP568746]
  8. [UCSF: K23AG032872]
  9. [R01AG048234]
  10. [R01AG032289]
  11. [R01MH102151]
  12. [R01MH085604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HIV-related white matter (WM) differences reported across studies are inconsistent. This is due to clinical and demographic heterogeneity of HIV infected populations, and variations in diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisition, processing, and analysis methods across studies. Therefore, reliable neuroanatomical consequences of infection and therapeutic targets are difficult to identify. Here, we pooled data from six existing HIV studies from around the world as part of the ENIGMA-HIV consortium to evaluate (1) the effects of harmonization of dMRI measures across sites using ComBat, and (2) whether an improved, higher-order tensor dMRI model, the tensor distribution function (TDF), and derived scalar index (FATDF) conferred higher sensitivity across heterogeneous sites to understand the effect of HIV on WM microstructure. This study suggests that improved dMRI indices and harmonization of these measures across cohorts, may be helpful for detecting consistent effects of disease on the brain in international multi-site studies, while preserving biological differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据