4.6 Article

Single-parameter scaling in the magnetoresistance of optimally doped La2-xSrxCuO4

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 100, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.155139

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. NSF [DMR-1461952, DMR-1919143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We show that the recent magnetoresistance (MR) data on La2-xSrxCuO4 (LSCO) in strong magnetic fields B [P. Giraldo-Gallo et al., Science 361, 479 (2018)] obeys single-parameter scaling of the form MR(B, T) = f (mu(H)(T)B), where mu(-1)(H)(T) similar to T alpha (1 <= alpha <= 2), from T = 180 K until T similar to 20 K, at which point the single-parameter scaling breaks down. The functional form of the MR is distinct from the simple quadratic-tolinear combination of temperature and magnetic field found in the optimally doped iron superconductor BaFe2(As1-xPx)(2) [I. M. Hayes et al., Nat. Phys. 12, 916 (2016)]. Further, the low-temperature departure of the MR in LSCO from its high-temperature scaling law leads us to conclude that the MR curve collapse is not the result of quantum critical scaling. We examine the classical two-dimensional (2D) effective medium theory (2DEMT) previously [A. A. Patel et al., Phys. Rev. X 8, 021049 (2018)] used to obtain the quadratic-to-linear resistivity dependence on field and temperature for metals with a T-linear zero-field resistivity. It appears that this scaling form results only for a binary, random distribution of metallic components. More generally, we find a low-temperature, high-field region where the resistivity is simultaneously T and B linear when multiple metallic components are present. Our findings indicate that if mesoscopic disorder is relevant to the magnetoresistance in strange metal materials, the binary-distribution model which seems to be relevant to the iron pnictides is distinct from the more broad-continuous distributions relevant to the cuprates. Using the latter, we examine the applicability of 2DEMT to the MR in LSCO and compare calculated MR curves with the experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据