4.7 Article

Slowing of the Solar Wind in the Outer Heliosphere

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 885, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e49

关键词

ISM: atoms; local interstellar matter; Sun: heliosphere; solar wind

资金

  1. New Horizons (NH) mission [NASW-02008]
  2. Advance Composition Explorer (ACE) mission [80NSSC18K0223]
  3. Heliophysics Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate [NNX12AB26G]
  4. Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) mission [NNX17AB04G]
  5. NASA Heliophysics Guest Investigator grant [NNX17AB74G]
  6. NASA [NNX17AB74G, 1003830] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a deeper understanding of how the solar wind evolves with increasing distance from the Sun as it encounters an increasing amount of interstellar material. This work extends our prior work by (1) extending the solar wind proton data radial profiles for New Horizons (NH) out to nearly 43 au, (2) quantifying the observed amount of slowing in the solar wind in the outer heliosphere by performing a detailed comparison between the speeds at NH (21?43 au) with speeds at 1 au, and (3) resolving discrepancies between the measured amount of slowing and estimates of the amount of slowing determined from the measured amount of interstellar pickup present in the solar wind. We find that the solar wind density radial profile may decrease at nearly or slightly less than a spherical expansion density profile. However, the temperature profile is well above what would be expected for an adiabatic profile. By comparing outer and inner heliospheric solar wind observations, we find the solar wind speed is reduced by 5%?7% between 30 and 43 au. We find the solar wind polytropic index (?(sw)) steeply decreases toward zero in the outer heliosphere (21?43 au) with a slope of ?0.031 au(?1). Using both this radial variation in ?(sw) and the measured amount of interstellar pickup ions, we estimate the slowing in the solar wind and obtain excellent agreement with the observed slowing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据