4.5 Article

Claudin Domain Containing 1 Contributing to Endothelial Cell Adhesion Decreases in Presence of Cerebellar Hemorrhage

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 95, 期 10, 页码 2051-2058

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24040

关键词

cerebellar hemorrhage; claudin domain containing 1; endothelial cell; vascular permeability

资金

  1. Research Center for Green Science, Fukuyama University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The claudin family comprises four-pass transmembrane proteins involved in the formation of tight junctions (TJs). Relatively recently, claudin domain containing (CLDND) 1, also known as claudin-25, was identified as a novel member of the claudin family. In the present study, we revealed that in the adult murine brain, CLDND1 is abundant in the cerebellum among common sites of intracerebral hemorrhage. Thus, the dynamics of CLDND1 after cerebellar hemorrhage were examined. Both CLDND1 mRNA and protein levels transiently decreased at 24 hr after hemorrhagic insult. For immunostaining, an anti-CLDND1 antibody that recognizes the specific epitope in the extracellular first loop was prepared. Dual immunohistochemical staining with CD31 using coronal cryosections of intact murine cerebellum tissue revealed that CLDND1 is expressed on endothelial cells. We therefore performed an in vitro permeability test using a human brain endothelial cell (HBEC) line to reveal whether CLDND1 contributes to cell adhesion like other claudins. CLDND1 was expressed on HBECs as well as in murine cerebellum tissue, and a strong signal was observed at TJs. RNA interference against CLDND1 decreased both the mRNA and protein levels without cytotoxicity. The permeability to small molecules, but not to large ones, across confluent HBECs increased on CLDND1 knockdown compared with mock-treated cells. These results suggest that the transient decrease of CLDND1 after cerebellar hemorrhage is responsible for low-molecular-weight selective vascular hyperpermeability. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据