4.7 Article

Mediation of Movement-Induced Breakthrough Cancer Pain by IB4-Binding Nociceptors in Rats

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 37, 期 20, 页码 5111-5122

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1212-16.2017

关键词

breakthrough pain; c-fiber; cancer pain; IB4; nonpeptidergic; peptidergic

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute) [T32CA009213]
  2. National Institutes on Drug Abuse [DA034975]
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [P20GM103643]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer-induced bone pain is characterized by moderate to severe ongoing pain that commonly requires the use of opiates. Even when ongoing pain is well controlled, patients can suffer breakthrough pain (BTP), episodic severe pain that breaks through the medication. We developed a novel model of cancer-induced BTP using female rats with mammary adenocarcinoma cells sealed within the tibia. We demonstrated previously that rats with bone cancer learn to prefer a context paired with saphenous nerve block to elicit pain relief (i.e., conditioned place preference, CPP), revealing the presence of ongoing pain. Treatment with systemic morphine abolished CPP to saphenous nerve block, demonstrating control of ongoing pain. Here, we show that pairing BTP induced by experimenter-induced movement of the tumor-bearing hindlimb with a context produces conditioned place avoidance (CPA) in rats treated with morphine to control ongoing pain, consistent with clinical observation of BTP. Preventing movement-induced afferent input by saphenous nerve block before, but not after, hindlimb movement blocked movement-induced BTP. Ablation of isolectin B4 (IB4)-binding, but not TRPV1(+), sensory afferents eliminated movement-induced BTP, suggesting that input from IB4-binding fibers mediates BTP. Identification of potential molecular targets specific to this population of fibers may allow for the development of peripherally restricted analgesics that control BTP and improve quality of life in patients with skeletal metastases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据