4.3 Article

Collagenosis of the Deep Medullary Veins: An Underrecognized Pathologic Correlate of White Matter Hyperintensities and Periventricular Infarction?

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnen/nlx009

关键词

Alzheimer disease; Leukoaraiosis; Neuroimaging; Pathology; Veins; Venous collagenosis; White matter hyperintensities

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 13129]
  2. Alzheimer Society of Canada
  3. L. C. Campbell Foundation
  4. Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are prevalent. Although arteriolar disease has been implicated in their pathogenesis, venous pathology warrants consideration. We investigated relationships of WMH with histologic venous, arteriolar and white matter abnormalities and correlated findings with premortem neuroimaging. Three regions of periventricular white matter were sampled from archived autopsy brains of 24 pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease (AD) and 18 age-matched nonAD patients. Using trichrome staining, venous collagenosis (VC) of periventricular veins (< 150 mu m in diameter) was scored for severity of wall thickening and occlusion; percent stenosis by collagenosis of large caliber (> 200 mu m) veins (laVS) was measured. Correlations were made between WMH in premortem neuroimaging and vascular and white matter pathology. We found greater VC (U-(114) = 2092.5, p = 0.005 and U-(114) = 2121.5, p = 0.002 for small and medium caliber veins, respectively) and greater laVS (t((110)) = 3.46, p = 0.001) in patients with higher WMH scores; WMH scores correlated with VC (r(s(114)) = 0.27, p = 0.004) and laVS (r(s(110)) = 0.38, p< 0.001). By multiple linear regression analysis, the strongest predictor of WMH score was laVS (beta = 0.338, p< 0.0001). VC was frequent in patients with periventricular infarcts identified on imaging. We conclude that periventricular VC is associated with WMH in both AD and nonAD patients and the potential roles of VC in WMH pathogenesis merit further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据