4.0 Article

Design of pectin-based bioink containing bioactive agent-loaded microspheres for bioprinting

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab4dbc

关键词

pectin; scaffold; bioprinting; chitosan; microsphere; double-emulsion; estradiol (E2)

资金

  1. Milwaukee School of Engineering Rader School of Business Seed Money Grant
  2. Medicine and engineering foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [YG2016MS71]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81873816]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Health and Family PlanningCommission [201640366]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioprinting offers an alternative approach for tissue engineering and exhibits the great potential to play a key role in personalized medicine. One of the major advantages of bioprinting is its capability of achieving the homogeneous distribution of cells within large tissue scaffolds. Microspheres have been used for controlled release of bioactive molecules in tissue engineering. Recently studies show that microspheres, especially positively charged, could promote the vascularized tissue formation. This study aims to develop a bioprinted scaffold containing microspheres. The double emulsion system, water in oil in water (W/O/W), was used to produce the microspheres considering its advantage for controlled release of small molecules. Design Expert Software was used to optimize the microsphere production process and chitosan coating was performed to provide the positively charged surface of the microspheres. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and confocal microscopic analysis confirmed the successful formation of the microspheres as well as the loading of bioactive molecules, e.g., estradiol (E2), into the microspheres. Bioprintability of the microsphere incorporated bioink was tested. The results indicated that microspheres did not adversely affect the bioprinting process. This novel tissue scaffold shows great promise for tissue engineering applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据