4.5 Article

Serial changes in lymphocyte subsets in patients with newly diagnosed high grade astrocytomas treated with standard radiation and temozolomide

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 135, 期 2, 页码 343-351

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2580-z

关键词

High grade astrocytoma; Lymphopenia; Radiation; Temozolomide; Lymphocyte subsets

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health through the National Cancer Institute [K12CA167540]
  2. National Institutes of Health/ National Cancer Institute Center Support Grant [P30CA008748]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The immune system plays a significant role in cancer prevention and outcome. In high grade astrocytomas (HGA), severe lymphopenia is associated with shortened survival due to tumor progression. This study was performed to quantify serial changes in lymphocyte subsets in HGA following standard radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ). Adults (KPS > 60, HIV negative) with newly diagnosed HGA scheduled to receive concurrent RT and TMZ and adjuvant TMZ were eligible. Blood was collected before beginning concurrent RT/TMZ and at weeks 6, 10, 18, and 26, and 3 months after completing adjuvant TMZ. Lymphocyte subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry. Twenty patients (70% glioblastoma, median age 53, 50% male, 80% Caucasian) who enrolled from January 2014 to August 2014 were followed until April 2016. Baseline dexamethasone dose was 0.5 mg/day and 15% had absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) < 1000 cells/mm(3) before starting RT/TMZ. However, 75% developed lymphopenia with ALC < 1000 cells/mm(3) after completion of RT/TMZ. NK cells, B cells and all T lymphocytes subsets dropped significantly after concurrent RT/TMZ and remained depressed for the 48 weeks of observation. The CD4+/CD8+ ratio was not affected significantly during follow-up. Severe lymphopenia involving all subsets occurred early in treatment and remained present for nearly 1 year. To our knowledge, this is the first report of serial trends in lymphocyte subsets following standard RT and TMZ for HGA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据