4.7 Article

An efficient authentication and key agreement scheme for multi-gateway wireless sensor networks in IoT deployment

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2016.12.008

关键词

Smart card; Sensor capture attack; Wireless sensor network; Multi-gateway; User anonymity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61300220]
  2. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [16B089]
  3. PAPD
  4. CICAEET
  5. University Grants Commission, India through UGC-BSR Start-up grant [3(A)(60)31]
  6. Fujian Education and Scientific Research Program for Young and Middle-aged Teachers [JA14369]
  7. University Distinguished Young Research Talent Training Program of Fujian Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) for Internet of Things (IoT) can be deployed in a wide range of industries such as agriculture and military. However, designing a secure and reliable authentication scheme for WSNs that can be deployed in IoT remains a research and operational challenge. For example, recently in 2016, Amin and Biswas showed that the Turcanovic et al.'s scheme is vulnerable to smart card loss attack, user impersonation attack, etc. They then proposed a new authentication scheme for WSNs with multi-gateway. In this paper, we revisit the scheme of Amin and Biswas and reveal previously unknown vulnerabilities in the scheme (i.e. sensor capture attack, user forgery attack, gateway forgery attack, sensor forgery attack and off-line guessing attack). In addition, we demonstrate that the user in the scheme can be tracked due to the use of a constant pseudo-identity and previously established session keys can be calculated by the attacker. Rather than attempting to fix a broken scheme, we present a novel authentication scheme for multi-gateway based WSNs. We then demonstrate the security of the proposed scheme using Proverif, as well as evaluating the good performance of the scheme using NS-2 simulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据