4.6 Article

Discovery of a New Stellar Subpopulation Residing in the (Inner) Stellar Halo of the Milky Way

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 886, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5286

关键词

Chemically peculiar stars; Stellar dynamics; Galaxy stellar content; Galaxy stellar halos; Silicon stars; High resolution spectroscopy; Stellar abundances; Stellar kinematics

资金

  1. FONDECYT [3180210, 1170518, 1170121]
  2. European COST Action [CA16117, 41736]
  3. Physics Frontier Center/JINA Center for the Evolution of the Elements (JINA-CEE) - US National Science Foundation [PHY 14-30152]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1931102]
  5. hundred-talent project of Sun Yat-sen University
  6. FAPESP [2017/15893-1]
  7. DGAPA-PAPIIT grant [IG100319]
  8. UNAM/PAPIIT grant [IN105916]
  9. BASAL Center for Astrophysics and Associated Technologies (CATA) [AFB 170002]
  10. Ministry for the Economy, Development and Tourism, Programa Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio grant [IC120009]
  11. Region de Franche-Comte
  12. Institut des Sciences de l'Univers (INSU)
  13. Centre national d'etudes spatiales (CNES) [0101973]
  14. UTINAM Institute of the Universite de Franche-Comte - Region de Franche-Comte
  15. UTINAM Institute of the Universite de Franche-Comte - Institut des Sciences de l'Univers (INSU)
  16. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  17. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  18. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  19. Brazilian Participation Group
  20. Carnegie Institution for Science
  21. Carnegie Mellon University
  22. Chilean Participation Group
  23. French Participation Group
  24. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  25. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  26. Johns Hopkins University
  27. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  28. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  29. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  30. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  31. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  32. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  33. National Astronomical Observatory of China
  34. New Mexico State University
  35. New York University
  36. University of Dame
  37. Observatorio Nacional/MCTI
  38. Ohio State University
  39. Pennsylvania State University
  40. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  41. United Kingdom Participation Group
  42. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  43. University of Arizona
  44. University of Colorado Boulder
  45. University of Oxford
  46. University of Portsmouth
  47. University of Utah
  48. University of Virginia
  49. University of Washington
  50. University of Wisconsin
  51. Vanderbilt University
  52. Yale University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the discovery of a unique collection of metal-poor giant stars that exhibit anomalously high levels of Si-28, clearly above typical Galactic levels. Our sample spans a narrow range of metallicities, peaking at ?1.07;;0.06, and exhibits abundance ratios of [Si, Al/Fe] that are as extreme as those observed in Galactic globular clusters (GCs), and Mg is slightly less overabundant. In almost all the sources we used, the elemental abundances were redetermined from high-resolution spectra, which were reanalyzed assuming LTE. Thus, we compiled the main element families, namely, the light elements (C, N), ?-elements (O, Mg, Si), iron-peak element (Fe), s-process elements (Ce, Nd), and the light odd-Z element (Al). We also provide dynamical evidence that most of these stars lie on tight (inner) halo-like and retrograde orbits passing through the bulge. Such kinds of objects have been found in present-day halo GCs, providing the clearest chemical signature of past accretion events in the (inner) stellar halo of the galaxy, possibly formed as the result of dissolved halo GCs. Their chemical composition is, in general, similar to that of typical GC populations, although several differences exist.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据