4.2 Article

Simultaneous Extraction of DNA and RNA from Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hep G2) Based on Silica-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 802-806

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2017.12442

关键词

Nucleic Acids; Simultaneous Extraction; Magnetic Nanoparticles; Hep G2

资金

  1. 863 Program [2012AA022703]
  2. National Key Special Science Program [2013ZX10004103-002]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61201033, 21205013, 61527806]
  4. Projects of Development of Science and Medical Technology [201208038]
  5. Health Ministry of Nanjing [ZKX12038]
  6. Clinical Science and Technology Special Projects in Jiangsu Province [BL2014094]
  7. Talents Planning of Six Summit Fields of Jiangsu Province [2013-WSN-056]
  8. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551491, 2015T80487]
  9. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [1302007A]
  10. Economical Forest Cultivation and Utilization of Collaborative Innovation Center in Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nucleic acid (NA) extraction from cancer cells is an essential step in molecular oncologic testing. The conventional NA extraction protocols, based on several ultracentrifugation steps, suffer from time-consuming and complex manipulation. Here, a magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) based method for simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from cancer cells is described. This MNP based technique has received great attention and significant interest due to its convenient manipulation, low cost and ease for automation. Different factors including lysis buffer, ethanol, MNPs and washing buffers which may affect the yield of nucleic acid were optimized. The average yield of DNA and RNA obtained from 1 mL Hep G2 (similar to 10(6) cells) ranged from 9.7 to 14.7 mu g with A260/A280 values between 1.68 and 2.01. The isolated DNA and RNA, using this method, were suitable for downstream activities such as PCR and RT-PCR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据