4.4 Article

Modeling of the Variation of Lateral Doping (VLD) Lateral Power Devices via 1-D Analysis Using Effective Concentration Profile Concept

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JEDS.2019.2942188

关键词

Electric fields; Doping profiles; Couplings; Semiconductor process modeling; Junctions; Electric breakdown; Variation of lateral doping; effective concentration profile; 1-D breakdown theory; breakdown voltage

资金

  1. China Post-Doctoral Science Foundation [2018M642291]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [SBK2019041165]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [6190030245, 61574081, 61704084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The VLD technique has introduced for the propose of achieving the ideal surface electric field via a non-uniformly doped drift region. Yet, the ideal doping profile is impossible to be fulfilled in practical thus breaking the optimized lateral breakdown characteristic. In addition, the conventional 2-D methods, due to its complexity, are impractical in both explaining its physical nature and providing designing guidance. In this paper, a simple 1-D methodology based on Effective Concentration Profile (ECP) theory is proposed to provide the physical insight of the VLD technique and quantitatively depict its breakdown characteristic. The VLD-ECP concept indicates that the perfectly even surface electric field can be obtained by adjusting the drift region doping dose equals to the Charge Appointment Line (CAL) so that all the charges in drift region contribute to the vertical depletion, thus the lateral structure being an equivalently P-I-N junction. Considering non-ideal doping profile of commercial devices, a designing optimization criterion is proposed to avoid the undesirable lateral breakdown. The analytical results obtained by the proposed model are found to be sufficiently accurate comparing with TCAD simulation results verifying the veracity and effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据