4.6 Article

A low-cost sensor based on silver nanoparticles for determining chemical oxygen demand in wastewater via image processing analysis

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 11, 期 43, 页码 5577-5583

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ay01755k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Ensino Superior (CAPES)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Pro-reitoria de Pesquisa da UFRN (PROPESQ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) is a quality parameter of superficial water and wastewater that provides information on chemically degradable fractions of organic (and inorganic) pollutants. Although firmly established, the conventional colorimetric method certified by Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) requires a lengthy time for diagnosis, indiscriminate use of toxic chemical reagents and a spectrophotometer, which may not be easily available, especially in developing countries. This report proposes the development of a paper-based sensor functionalized with silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) for measuring COD content in wastewater by Image Processing Analysis. The sensor was employed on samples of real effluents with COD varying from 66 to 1160 mg L-1. The color of the sensor changed from yellow to gray upon its exposure to the effluent, which is a consequence of sulfidation of AgNPs. Digital image processing was used to extract the channels from the RGB (Red-Green-Blue) color system, where the resulting dataset was evaluated with Principal Component Analysis, Multiple Linear Regression and Second Order Regression. The calibration curve presented good linearity (R = 0.96) and the COD content of wastewater was similar to that verified with the conventional method. No statistical difference was observed at a confidence level of 95%. This simple method may be envisaged as a promising alternative tool for the determination of COD in wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据