4.2 Article

Ethylene Scavenging Ability of Permanganate Incorporated Nanoclays

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 17, 期 5, 页码 3576-3580

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2017.12800

关键词

Nanoclays; Pore Fabrication; Acid Treatment; Permanganate; Ethylene Scavenger

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP) of the Korean government
  2. Korea Industrial Technology Association (KOITA) as A study on the programs to support a collaborative research among industry, academia and research institutes [KOITA-20143]
  3. Rural Development Administration (RDA, Korea) as a Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development [PJ010502]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethylene scavengers were developed utilizing pore-fabricated nanoclays, such as illite (IL) and scoria (SC), incorporated with permanganate. To modify the pore structure and to enhance specific surface area, nanoclays were subjected to 6 M hydrochloric acid treatment for 6 h at 60 degrees C. X-ray diffraction patterns revealed that acid treated nanoclays (IL-AT and SC-AT) maintained their original crystal structure, while N-2 adsorption-desorption isotherm showed increased specific surface area and pore volume. The surface charge values of acid treated nanoclays shifted in the negative direction due to leaching of multivalent cations, which was confirmed by X-ray fluorescence elemental quantitative analysis. Permanganate, which is known to remove ethylene through oxidative decomposition, was incorporated into the nanopores of acid treated nanoclays by soaking them in potassium permanganate solution, showing 1.00 and 0.61 wt/wt% loading for IL-AT and SC-AT, respectively. The ethylene gas removal efficacies of permanganate-incorporated nanoclays were examined in 50 ppm ethylene condition. Permanganate loaded IL showed time-dependent ethylene removal with a maximum efficiency of approximately 95% at 24 h, while SC exhibited approximately 30% removal efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据