3.8 Article

Protective Effects of Silymarin Against Age-Related Hearing Loss in an Aging Rat Model

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1294-7

关键词

Silymarin; Age-related hearing loss; d-Galactose

类别

资金

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) is one of the most common chronic degenerative disorders. Several studies have indicated that supplementation with some antioxidants can slow down the progression of ARHL. Despite several lines of evidence about the potent antioxidant and anti-aging effects of silymarin, its protective effect against ARHL has not evaluated yet. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of silymarin in prevention of ARHL in a d-Galactose-induced aging rat model for the first time. 45 male wistar rats aged 3-month old were divided into 5 groups: group 1, 2 and 3 received 500 mg/kg/day d-Gal plus 100, 200 and 300 mg/kg/day silymarin respectively for 8 weeks, placebo group received 500 mg/kg/day d-Gal plus propylene glycol as placebo, and control group received normal saline during this period of time. Auditory brainstem responses were measured at several frequencies (4, 6, 8, 12 and 16 kHz) before and after the intervention. Placebo group and group 3 showed significant ABR threshold increase across frequencies of 4, 6, 16 kHz compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). However, rats treated with silymarin 100 and 200 mg/kg/day plus d-Gal did not show any significant ABR threshold shifts. Similarly, ABR amplitude of P2 at 4, 8 kHz and P1, P4 at 4 kHz in the placebo group and group 3 were decreased significantly compared with other groups (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences are found in ABR absolute and inter-peak latencies between groups (P > 0.05). The findings indicates that silymarin with doses of 100 and 200 mg/kg/day has protective effect against ARHL and it can be supplemented into the diet of older people to slow down the progression of age-related hearing loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据