4.5 Article

Renormalized approach to neutrinoless double-β decay

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 100, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.055504

关键词

-

资金

  1. LDRD program at Los Alamos National Laboratory
  2. DOE topical collaboration on Nuclear Theory for Double Beta Decay and Fundamental Symmetries
  3. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-FG0204ER41338, DE-SC0009919, DE-AC52-06NA25396, DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. NUCLEI SciDAC program
  5. NUCLEI INCITE program
  6. European Union Research and Innovation program Horizon 2020 [654002]
  7. RHIC Physics Fellow Program of the RIKEN BNL Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The process at the heart of neutrinoless double-beta decay, nn -> pp e(-) e(-) induced by a light Majorana neutrino, is investigated in pionless and chiral effective field theory. We show in various regularization schemes the need to introduce a short-range lepton-number-violating operator at leading order, confirming earlier findings. We demonstrate that such a short-range operator is only needed in spin-singlet S-wave transitions, while leading-order transitions involving higher partial waves depend solely on long-range currents. Calculations are extended to include next-to-leading-order corrections in perturbation theory, where to this order no additional undetermined parameters appear. We establish a connection based on chiral symmetry between neutrinoless double-beta decay and nuclear charge-independence breaking induced by electromagnetism. Data on the latter confirm the need for a leading-order short-range operator but do not allow for a full determination of the corresponding lepton-number-violating coupling. Using a crude estimate of this coupling, we perform ab initio calculations of the matrix elements for neutrinoless double-beta decay for He-6 and Be-12. We speculate on the phenomenological impact of the leading short-range operator on the basis of these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据