4.4 Article

Hydro-mechanical analysis of rainfall-induced fines migration process within unsaturated soils

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 2603-2619

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-017-4359-2

关键词

Rainfall infiltration; Fines migration; Internal erosion; Seepage deformation; Slope stability

资金

  1. Hundred Young Talents Program of IMHE [SDSQB-2016-01]
  2. NSFC [41702331, 41771021, 41472293]
  3. NSFC-ICIMOD [41661144041]
  4. Light of the West of CAS [Y7R2070070]
  5. Youth fund of IMHE [Y7K2050050]
  6. Key Research & Development Program and the Scientific Support Program of the Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2017SZ0041, 2016SZ0067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seepage-induced fines migration under rainfall infiltration is a main cause leading to shallow failures in loose colluvial slopes. To describe the full process of fines migration within unsaturated soils during rainfall infiltration and the associated hydro-mechanical behaviors, a seepage-erosion-deformation coupled formulation is proposed in this paper. The governing equations proposed are implemented into a finite element code and used to investigate the influences of skeleton deformation on the rainfall infiltration process through unsaturated soil columns. The numerical results were presented in detail for a better understanding of the rainfall-induced fines migration process within unsaturated soils. Further, the obtained results are integrated into an infinite slope model for slope stability analysis. The results show that, the skeleton deformation will affect the rainfall infiltration rate and hence the timing of slope failures; meanwhile their influences are more evident if the fines deposition process is taken into account. Moreover, the slope stability could be reduced gradually due to the soil strength loss along with loss of fine particles. Therefore, particular attentions should be paid to analyzing the stability of soil slopes susceptible to internal erosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据