4.6 Article

A Joint DFT and Experimental Study of an Imidazolidinone Additive in Lithium-Ion Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 166, 期 15, 页码 A3707-A3715

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1091914jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Tesla Canada under the Industrial Research Chair program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrolyte additives are a practical route to improving the lifetime and performance of lithium-ion cells. It is not well understood what makes a good additive; thus, the discovery of new additives poses a significant challenge. Computational methods have the potential to streamline the search for new additives, but it is important to compare predicted additive behavior with experimentally measured results. A new electrolyte additive, 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone (DMI), has been evaluated in LiNi1-x-yMnxCoyO2 (NMC)/graphite pouch cells as a single additive and with the co-additive vinylene carbonate (VC). This work compares the density functional theory (DFT)-predicted behavior of DMI with experimental results, including differential capacity analysis (dQ/dV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), high-temperature storage, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and long-term cycling tests. The DFT-calculated reduction potential of DMI is -0.63 V vs Li/Li+, consistent with the experimental observation that it reduces at a lower potential than ethylene carbonate (EC), similar to 0.80 V vs Li/Li+. Although DMI turns out not to be a competitively useful additive, the good match between many aspects of the experimental results and theoretical predictions is a good indication that it is possible to understand aspects of the behavior of additives. This can guide future researchers. (c) The Author(s) 2019. Published by ECS. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse of the work in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据