4.7 Article

The thermally induced decarboxylation mechanism of a mixed-oxidation state carboxylate-based iron metal-organic framework

期刊

CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS
卷 55, 期 85, 页码 12769-12772

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cc04555d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Gas Separations Relevant to Clean Energy Technologies, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001015]
  2. Robert A. Welch Foundation through a Welch Endowed Chair [A-0030]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory [DE-FE0026472]
  4. National Science Foundation Small Business Innovation Research (NSF-SBIR) [1632486]
  5. NPRP award from the Qatar National Research Fund [NPRP9-377-1-080]
  6. National Institutes of Health [R35 GM127021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investigations into a thermally generated decarboxylation mechanism for metal site activation and the generation of mesopores in a carboxylate iron-based MOF, PCN-250, have been conducted. PCN-250 exhibits an interesting oxidation state change during thermal treatment under inert atmospheres or vacuum conditions, transitioning from an Fe(III) 3 cluster to a Fe(II)Fe(III) 2 cluster. To probe this redox event and discern amechanism of activation, a combination of thermogravimetric analysis, gas sorption, scanning electron microscopy, 57Fe Mo ssbauer spectroscopy, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and X-ray diffraction studies were conducted. The results suggest that the iron-site activation occurs due to ligand decarboxylation above 200 8C. This is also consistent with the generation of a missing cluster mesoporous defect in the framework. The resulting mesoporous PCN-250 maintains high thermal stability, preserving crystallinity after multiple consecutive hightemperature regeneration cycles. Additionally, the thermally reduced PCN-250 shows improvements in the total uptake capacity of methane and CO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据