4.6 Article

Structural variety of mono- and binuclear transition metal complexes of 3-[(2-hydroxy-benzylidene)-hydrazono]-1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-butan-1-one: Synthesis, spectral, thermal, molecular modeling, antimicrobial and antitumor studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1134, 期 -, 页码 649-660

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.01.012

关键词

Polydentate Schiff base; Mono- and binuclear complexes; Thermal studies; Molecular modeling; Antimicrobial activity; Antitumor activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new polydentate Schiff base ligand and its metal complexes were synthesized and characterized by elemental analyses, IR, H-1 NMR, electronic, ESR and mass spectra, conductivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements as well as thermal analyses. The free ligand was synthesized by condensation of o-acetoacetyiphenol with salicylaldehyde hydrazone. The analytical and spectroscopic tools showed that the obtained complexes are mono- and binuclear complexes, which can be generally formulated as: [(L) M2X2(H2O)(m)]center dot nZ; M = Cr, Fe, Ni or Cu, X = OAc or NO3, m = 5 or nil and n = 3,1.5 or 0.5 and Z = EtOH or H2O, [(H2L)(2)M(X)(m)].nH(2)O; M = Mn, Zn, or Cd, X = EtOH, H2O or nil, m = 2 or nil and n = 3.5 or 0, [(HL)(2)CO2]center dot 0.5H(2)O and [(H2L)(2)UO2(H2O)]. The metal complexes displayed octahedral, tetrahedral and square-planar geometrical arrangements, while uranium complex displayed seven-coordinate. Kinetic parameters (Ea, A, Delta H, Delta S and Delta G) of the thermal decomposition stages have been evaluated using Coats -Redfern equations. The molecular structural parameters of the ligand and its metal complexes have been calculated and correlated with the experimental data such as IR. The antimicrobial activity of the ligand and its complexes was screened against some kinds of bacteria and fungi. The antitumor activity of the ligand and its Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes was investigated against HepG2 cell line. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据