4.8 Review

High-performance conjugated polymer donor materials for polymer solar cells with narrow-bandgap nonfullerene acceptors

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 3225-3246

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ee02531f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91633301, 51873140, 51603136]
  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past few years, the emergence of nonfullerene (n-type organic semiconductor (n-OS)) acceptors combining with the rational design of conjugated polymer donor materials has dominated the rapid development of highly efficient polymer solar cells (PSCs). Relative to the traditional fullerene derivative acceptors, narrow bandgap n-OS acceptors with a fused ring core possess the advantages of strong absorption in the visible-near infrared region and tunable electronic energy levels. On the other hand, the anisotropic conjugated structures of n-OS acceptors make it more challenging to match them with conjugated polymer donors. Therefore, it is critical to rationally design conjugated polymer donors with complementary absorption and matching electronic energy levels with nonfullerene acceptors for realizing high performance PSCs. Here we review the recent development of state-of-the-art wide-bandgap conjugated polymer donor materials, including D-A copolymers with BDT (benzodithiophene) as the D-unit and BDD (1,3-bis(thiophen-2-yl)-5,7-bis(2-ethylhexyl)benzo[1,2-c:4,5-c ']dithiophene-4,8-dione), FBTA (fluorinated benzotriazole) or quinoxaline as the A-unit, etc., for efficient PSCs based on narrow bandgap n-OS acceptors. Our focus is mainly on the design strategies, chemical structure-property relationships, and photovoltaic performance of the polymer donors. We hope that this review article could contribute to better understanding of the design strategies of high-performance conjugated polymer donors for nonfullerene PSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据