4.6 Article

Three new hydrochlorothiazide cocrystals: Structural analyses and solubility studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1133, 期 -, 页码 405-410

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.12.019

关键词

Crystal engineering; Cocrystal; Solubility; Thermal analysis; Structural analysis

资金

  1. CSIR [02(0156)/13/EMR-II]
  2. DST [DST/SJF/CSA-02/2014-15]
  3. SERB, DST [EMR/000099/2014]
  4. Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India
  5. IISER-Kolkata
  6. Royal Society of Chemistry [2015/16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) is a diuretic BCS class IV drug with poor aqueous solubility and low permeability leading to poor oral absorption. The present work explores the cocrystallization technique to enhance the aqueous solubility of HCT. Three new cocrystals of HCT with water soluble coformers phenazine (PHEN), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) and picolinamide (PICA) were prepared successfully by solution crystallization method and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), fourier transform -infraredspectroscopy (FT-IR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Structural characterization revealed that the cocrystals with PHEN, DMAP and PICA exists in P2(1)/n, P2(1)/c and P2(1)/n space groups, respectively. The improved solubility of HCT-DMAP (4 fold) and HCT-PHEN (1.4 fold) cocrystals whereas decreased solubility of HCT-PICA (0.5 fold) as compared to the free drug were determined after 4 h in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, at 25 degrees C by using shaking flask method. HCT-DMAP showed a significant increase in solubility than all previously reported cocrystals of HO' suggest the role of a coformer. The study demonstrates that the selection of coformer could have pronounced impact on the physicochemical properties of HO' and cocrystallization can be a promising approach to improve aqueous solubility of drugs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据