4.5 Article

Mechanical and Physical Properties of Kenaf-reinforced Poly(lactic acid) Plasticized with Epoxidized Jatropha Oil

期刊

BIORESOURCES
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 9001-9020

出版社

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV DEPT WOOD & PAPER SCI
DOI: 10.15376/biores.14.4.9001-9020

关键词

Polylactic acid; Kenaf; Epoxidized jatropha oil; Bio-sourced plasticizer; Environmentally friendly

资金

  1. Biopolymer Research Group
  2. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia
  3. Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)
  4. Ministry of Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epoxidized jatropha oil (EJO) was investigated as a sustainable alternative to petrochemical-based plasticizers to reinforce the plastics, leading to increased ductility and toughness of kenaf-reinforced poly(lactic acid) (PLA). The EJO was melt-blended into kenaf-reinforced PLA at concentrations from 1 wt% to 5 wt%. The blends were then hot-pressed into sheets to characterize their mechanical and physical properties. Kenaf fibers were treated with 6% sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and the effects thereof on the composites' tensile, flexural, and impact properties, as well as their water absorption and density were stu died. The impact strengths of the kenaf-reinforced PLA composites were improved with the addition of EJO up to 5 wt%, with a maximum over 10 times that of the neat PLA. The flexural strength and modulus increased 4% and 50%, respectively, for treated kenaf-reinforced PLA plasticized with EJO. This increase demonstrated the alkalization treatment's notable improvements to the composites' properties. Furthermore, analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the composites' tensile fracture surfaces indicated better interaction adhesion of the treated kenaf-reinforced PLA plasticized with EJO compared with the untreated composites. Compared to untreated 1 wt% EJO biocomposites, the treated 5 wt% EJO biocomposites reduced water absorption from 3.1% to 1.6% after 8 weeks of immersion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据