4.4 Article

Spatial and Temporal Variability of Semidiurnal Internal Tide Energetics in the Western Bay of Bengal

期刊

PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS
卷 176, 期 11, 页码 5203-5215

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-019-02221-4

关键词

Western Bay of Bengal; internal tides; energy budget; available potential energy

资金

  1. Naval Research Board (NRB), New Delhi
  2. Indian Institute of Technology Delhi HPC facility
  3. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three-dimensional Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm) with time-dependent forcing is implemented to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of internal tides over the eastern coast of India. Numerical simulations are conducted for a number of different months of the year for which in situ observations are available at high temporal resolution. During the months of November-December and March-April, peak spectral estimates of density variability are evident in the semidiurnal frequency band in both observations and simulations, while during August, variability is dominantly in the near-inertial frequency band. Empirical orthogonal functions (EOF) analysis is applied to decompose the baroclinic tidal currents into vertical modes. The results show that about 70-80% of the total variance is in the first mode, while the first three modes represent 90-95% of the total variance in all seasons. Internal tide characteristics such as phase speed, group speed, and wavelength are largest in the postmonsoon season. The magnitude of the computed energy flux is greatest during November, while the direction of propagation of internal tides is almost unchanged through the year. The available potential energy peaks in November (20 kJ m(-2)) and is smallest in August (14 kJ m(-2)). Calculation of the energy budget shows that the energy conversion rate from barotropic forcing to internal tides is about 85% in November but only about 46% in August.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据