4.5 Article

Chemically purified cellulose and its nanocrystals from sugarcane baggase: isolation and characterization

期刊

HELIYON
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02635

关键词

Materials chemistry; Baggase; By-product; Degradation; Hydrolysis; Hemicellulose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agro-wastes such as sugar cane bagasse can be explored for use in different aspects. Its applicability as a source of cellulose has attracted much interests especially in biomedical field among various applications. In the current work chemically purified cellulose (CPC) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were effectively extracted from sugarcane bagasse (SCB). The cellulose was obtained by chemical treatment of SCB using HNO3, NaOH and a bleaching agent. Nanocrystals were further prepared from the extracted cellulose using H2SO4 hydrolysis followed by washing with deionized water and acetone. The obtained materials were characterized for surface morphological using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The thermal properties were evaluated using TGA/DTG. The FTIR showed the disappearance of the peaks responsible for the hemicelluloses and lignin. These results were confirmed by TGA which proved gradual elimination of non-cellulosic constituents. X-ray Diffractometer depicted an increase in crystallinity occasioned by sequential treatments to get the cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose nanocrystals had a spherical shape with a diameter of 38nm as compared to the chemically purified cellulose which had a diameter of 76nm. The CNCs prepared with this method were seen to be less agglomerated and more crystalline thus possess a higher potential as bionanocomposite either for biomedical applications or for wastewater treatment among other industrial application. This approach also provides an opportunity for the sugar companies to effectively manage their waste product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据