4.6 Article

Synthesis, stereochemistry determination, pharmacological studies and quantum chemical analyses of bisthiazolidinone derivative

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1127, 期 -, 页码 99-113

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.07.089

关键词

Cytotoxicity; Cell cycle perturbation; DNA binding; Molecular docking and DFT studies

资金

  1. UGC (UGC-BSR fellowship)
  2. Chancellor Al-Falah University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new compound (3) bisthaizolidinone derivative was synthesized by Knoevenagel condensation reaction. The structure of synthesized compound was elucidated by different spectral techniques and X-ray diffraction studies. The stereochemistry of the compound (3) was determined by H-1-H-1 NOESY, H-1-H-1 NMR COSY and single crystal X-ray diffraction studies as (Z, Z)-configuration. The computational quantum chemical studies of compound(3) like, IR, UV, NBO analysis were performed by DFT with Becke-3-Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) exchange-correlation functional in combination with 6-311++G(d,p) basis sets. The DNA-binding of compound (3) exhibited a moderate binding constant (K-b = 1 x 10(5) Lmol(-1)) with hypochromic shift. The molecular docking displayed good binding affinity -7.18 kcal/mol. The MTT assay of compound (3) was screened against different cancerous cell lines, HepG2, Siha, Hela and MCF-7. Studies against these cell lines depicted that the screened compound (3) showed potent inhibitory activity against HepG2 cell (IC50 = 7.5 mu M) followed by MCF-7 (IC50 = 52.0 mu M), Siha (IC50 = 66.98 mu M), Hela (IC50 = 74.83 mu M) cell lines, and non-toxic effect against non-cancerous HEK-293 cells (IC50 = 287.89 mu M) at the concentration range (0-300) Furthermore, cell cycle perturbation was performed on HepG2 & Siha cell lines and observed that cells were arrested in G2/M in HepG2, and G0/G1 in Siha cell lines with respect to untreated control. Hence, compound (3) possesses potent anti cancerous activity against HepG2 cell line. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据