4.7 Review

Epigenetic regulation in cell senescence

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
卷 95, 期 12, 页码 1257-1268

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-017-1581-x

关键词

Senescence; DNA methylation; Histone modification; Chromatin remodelling complex; ncRNA

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [2016-I2M-1-011, 2016-I2M-1-015, 2016-I2M-1-016]
  2. National Key Research and Development Plan [2016YFC0903900]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91339201, 81422002, 91639304, 31571193]
  4. National Science and Technology Support Project [2013YQ0309230502, 2014BAI02B01, 2015BAI08B01]
  5. National Youth Top-notch Talent Support Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell senescence, which is an irreversible state of cell proliferative arrest, has emerged as a potentially important contributor to tissue dysfunction and organismal ageing. Cell senescence is triggered by a variety of senescence stressors, which affect gene expression and multiple signalling pathways that give rise to various senescence phenotypes. Epigenetic mechanisms, as critical regulators of chromosomal architecture and gene expression, have added an extra dimension to the molecular mechanisms of cell senescence. Cell senescence is accompanied by changes in DNA methylation, histone-associated epigenetic processes, chromatin remodelling and ncRNA expression. Those senescence-associated epigenetic alterations interact with the senescence regulatory programme networks and lead to various cell senescence phenotypes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of epigenetic changes and their effects on cell senescence. The differences in epigenetic alterations among different types of senescence are also discussed. Furthermore, we summarise the interactions among different epigenetic mechanisms during cell senescence and analyse the possibility of using epigenetic signatures as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the treatment of senescence-associated diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据