4.7 Article

Influence of acids, bases and surfactants on the photocatalytic degradation of a model dye rhodamine B

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 395-403

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.04.063

关键词

Surfactants; Micelles; Photodegradation; Solubilization; Encapsulations; UV/Visible

资金

  1. HEC Pakistan [4271/RD/HEC/14, IPFP/HRD/HEC/2014/1612]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic materials and additional components, especially promoters, play a pivotal role in the success of photocatalysed environmental remediation processes. To understand the influence of acid promoters in the absence and presence of surfactants, photocatalytic degradation of a model dye rhodamine B (RhB) was studied by UV-photocatalysis (254 nm UV source) with the subsequent addition of each of 0.01 mol dm(-3) of nitric acid (HNO3), sulphuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric (HCl), citric acid and acetic acid. Furthermore, the effect of 0.01 mol dm-3 of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and sodium carbonate (Na2CO3), as well as surfactants, including the cationic cetrimonium bromide (CTAB), anionic sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS) and non-ionic surfactant tween 80, were analyzed using a UV-Visible spectrophotometer. The K-obs. values for photodegradation of RhB under UV-irradiation was heavily dependent on,type of acid and base. Pre-micellar, micellar and post-micellar concentrations of surfactants were also analyzed for their effects on the photodegradation of RhB. Concentrations at and above the critical micelle concentration (CMC) were found to suppress the photocatalytic degradation of RhB in the presence of a promoter (HNO3). Micellar solubilization is responsible for the changes in the photocatalytic activity. Nonionic micelles are unable to protect the dye over longer times due to autooxidation process. The resulting degradation products of RhB by center dot OH were identified by LC-MS and GC-MS analysis and accordingly a schematic degradation pathway was proposed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据