3.8 Article

The Importance of Non-HLA Antibodies After Heart Transplant

期刊

CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 300-306

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40472-019-00254-1

关键词

Non-HLA antibodies; Rejection; Cardiac allograft vasculopathy

资金

  1. Heart and Stroke Foundation Canada Ontario Clinician Scientist Phase I award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of Review Antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) are associated with adverse patient and allograft outcomes after heart transplantation. Non-HLA antibodies have increasingly been recognized as important mediators of rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and allograft injury. In particular, these antibodies have been implicated in a subset of heart transplant recipients who have clinical and/or pathologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection in the absence of detectable antibodies against HLA. Recent Findings Non-HLA antigens have been identified to have important roles in both the innate and adaptive immune response in transplantation. These antigens are predominantly expressed on vascular endothelium of the donor heart and include major histocompatibility class I related chain A (MICA), G protein coupled receptor angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT(1)R), cytoskeletal elements such as myosin and vimentin. A growing number of studies have demonstrated antibodies to these antigens in rejection and development of CAV. At present, non-HLA antibodies are not routinely monitored post-transplant, and laboratory evaluation remains non-standardized. Further investigation is required to improve the detection of non-HLA antibodies, define pathophysiological mechanisms involved in allograft injury, and better understand their impact on clinical outcomes. Non-HLA antibodies have been identified as important mediators of rejection, allograft dysfunction, and CAV in heart transplantation. Ongoing investigations and improving laboratory detection methods will determine their potential role in post-transplant risk stratification and management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据