3.8 Article

An Engineering Toolbox for the Evaluation of Metallic Flow Field Plates

期刊

CHEMENGINEERING
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemengineering3040085

关键词

hydrogen purification; hydrogen compression; flow field plate; flow distribution; flow channel geometry; computational fluid dynamics

资金

  1. European Union [735533]
  2. Hydrogen Europe
  3. Hydrogen Europe research
  4. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [735533] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metallic flow field plates, also called bipolar plates, are an important component of fuel cell stacks, electrolyzers, hydrogen purification and compression stacks. The manufacturing of these plates by means of stamping or hydroforming is highly suitable for mass production. In this work, a toolbox is created that is suitable for a screening process of different flow field design variants. For this purpose, the geometry and computational mesh are generated in an automated manner. Basic building blocks are combined using the open source software SALOME, and these allow for the construction of a large variant of serpentine-like flow field structures. These geometric variants are evaluated through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations with the open source software OpenFOAM. The overall procedure allows for the screening of more than 100 variants within one week using a standard desktop computer. The performance of the flow fields is evaluated on the basis of two parameters: the overall pressure difference across the plate and the relative difference of the hydrogen concentration at the outlet of the channels. The results of such a screening first provide information about optimum channel geometry and the best choice of the general flow field layout. Such results are important at the beginning of the design process, as the channel geometry has an influence on the selection of the metal for deep drawing or hydroforming processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据