4.7 Article

Trametes orientalis polysaccharide alleviates PM2.5-induced lung injury in mice through its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities

期刊

FOOD & FUNCTION
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 8005-8015

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9fo01777a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universities Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province [15KJB550009]
  2. Research Project of Xuzhou University of Technology [XKY2018247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examined the molecular conformation of Trametes orientalis polysaccharide (TOP-2) and evaluated the ameliorative effects of TOP-2 on PM2.5-induced lung injury in mice. The Congo red test and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that TOP-2 had a triple-helical structure. PM2.5-induced pulmonary edema was ameliorated by TOP-2 intervention. PM2.5 notably increased the number of inflammatory cells and percentages of neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and notably reduced the percentages of macrophages in BALF, while TOP-2 abolished these effects. The increased levels of total protein, albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), myeloperoxidase (MPO), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta and IL-6 in BALF after PM2.5 exposure were inhibited by TOP-2. In addition, TOP-2 could not only remarkably promote the activities of antioxidant enzymes, but also reduce the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), protein carbonyl group (PCG) and 8-hydroxy-2 '-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). Furthermore, TOP-2 up-regulated the expressions of nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and inhibited the activation of NLR family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in the lung tissue. These results hint that TOP-2 could alleviate PM2.5-induced lung injury in mice via its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, and the underlying mechanisms, at least partly, depended on activation of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway and inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据