4.7 Article

How does environmental regulation break the resource curse: Theoretical and empirical study on China

期刊

RESOURCES POLICY
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101480

关键词

Environmental regulation; Resource curse coefficient; Economic growth

资金

  1. Key Projects of the National Social Science Foundation of China [18ZDA050]
  2. Graduates' Innovation Fund of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [2019ygscxcy051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper incorporates environmental regulation, resource development and economic growth into a unified framework, and introduces a four-sector endogenous growth model, including environmental protection sector and resource development sector. Then, the resource curse coefficients of 232 prefecture-level cities in China are estimated based on the data of China's Industrial Enterprise Database from 1998 to 2013. Finally, the breaking effect of environmental regulation on the resource curse and its internal mechanism are empirically examined. The results show that the resource curse effect mainly occurs in the inland cities of the central and western regions and the northeast region; while the phenomenon of resource curse does not exist in most coastal and eastern cities, only a few cities are in the marginal resource curse areas and serious resource curse areas. The relationship between environmental regulation and the resource curse coefficient presents an inverted U-shaped curve, and only when the environmental regulation intensity crosses the turning point can environmental regulation break the resource curse. Environmental regulation can also indirectly break the resource curse phenomenon in full samples by improving green technological innovation level, lowering resource dependence and accelerating manufacturing development However, the manufacturing development effect of environmental regulation on the resource curse has not yet been found in the resource curse areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据