4.7 Article

Tests of general relativity with the binary black hole signals from the LIGO-Virgo catalog GWTC-1

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 100, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.104036

关键词

-

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research of India
  2. Department of Science and Technology, India
  3. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), India
  4. Ministry of Human Resource Development, India
  5. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion
  6. Vicepresidencia i Conselleria d'Innovacio, Recerca i Turisme
  7. Conselleria d'Educacio i Universitat del Govern de les Illes Balears
  8. Conselleria d'Educacio, Investigacio, Cultura i Esport de la Generalitat Valenciana
  9. National Science Centre of Poland
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  11. Russian Foundation for Basic Research
  12. Russian Science Foundation
  13. European Commission
  14. European Regional Development Funds (ERDF)
  15. Royal Society
  16. Scottish Funding Council
  17. Scottish Universities Physics Alliance
  18. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA)
  19. Lyon Institute of Origins (LIO)
  20. Paris Ile-de-France Region
  21. National Research, Development and Innovation Office Hungary (NKFIH)
  22. National Research Foundation of Korea
  23. Industry Canada
  24. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation
  25. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Canada
  26. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  27. Brazilian Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovations, and Communications
  28. International Center for Theoretical Physics South American Institute for Fundamental Research (ICTP-SAIFR)
  29. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  30. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  31. Leverhulme Trust
  32. Research Corporation, the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan
  33. Kavli Foundation
  34. STFC [ST/N000633/1, 1938553, 1802888, ST/N005406/2, ST/R00045X/1, ST/I006269/1, 1653089, ST/N005430/1, ST/T000147/1, ST/K000845/1, ST/N005422/1, 2142081, ST/H002006/1, 1947165, 2039699, ST/J00166X/1, ST/S000550/1, 1947199, ST/N000072/1, ST/K005014/1, Gravitational Waves, PPA/G/S/2002/00652, ST/N00003X/1, 1802894, 1945971, ST/V001396/1, ST/K005014/2, ST/N005406/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detection of gravitational waves by Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo provides an opportunity to test general relativity in a regime that is inaccessible to traditional astronomical observations and laboratory tests. We present four tests of the consistency of the data with binary black hole gravitational waveforms predicted by general relativity. One test subtracts the best-fit waveform from the data and checks the consistency of the residual with detector noise. The second test checks the consistency of the low- and high-frequency parts of the observed signals. The third test checks that phenomenological deviations introduced in the waveform model (including in the post-Newtonian coefficients) are consistent with 0. The fourth test constrains modifications to the propagation of gravitational waves due to a modified dispersion relation, including that from a massive graviton. We present results both for individual events and also results obtained by combining together particularly strong events from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo, as collected in the catalog GWTC-1. We do not find any inconsistency of the data with the predictions of general relativity and improve our previously presented combined constraints by factors of 1.1 to 2.5. In particular, we bound the mass of the graviton to be m(g) <= 4.7 x 10(-23) eV/c(2) (90% credible level), an improvement of a factor of 1.6 over our previously presented results. Additionally, we check that the four gravitational-wave events published for the first time in GWTC-1 do not lead to stronger constraints on alternative polarizations than those published previously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据