4.5 Article

Therapeutic effects of inhibition of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on voiding dysfunction in mice with spinal cord injury

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 317, 期 5, 页码 F1305-F1310

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00239.2019

关键词

brain-derived neurotropic factor; detrusor sphincter dyssynergia; spinal cord injury

资金

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-17-1-0403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the involvement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in bladder and urethral dysfunction using spinal cord-injured mice. We evaluated bladder and urethral function of female mice with 4-wk spinal cord injury (SCI) by filling cystometry and electromyography (EMG) of the external urethral sphincter (EUS) under a conscious condition. Anti-BDNF antibodies (10 mu g.kg(-1).h(-1)) were administered in some mice for 1 wk before the evaluation. Bladder and spinal (L6-S1) BDNF protein levels were examined by ELISA. Transcript levels of transient receptor potential channels or acid-sensing ion channels (Asic) in L6-S1 dorsal root ganglia were evaluated by RT-PCR. Voided volume and voiding efficiency were significantly increased without any changes in nonvoiding contractions, and the duration of reduced EMG activity during the voiding phase was significantly prolonged in anti-BDNF antibody-treated SCI mice. Compared with spinal cord-intact mice, SCI mice showed increased concentrations of bladder and spinal BDNF. Anti-BDNF antibody treatment decreased bladder and spinal BDNF protein concentrations of SCI mice. Asic2 and Asic3 transcripts were significantly increased after SCI but decreased after anti-BDNF antibody administration. These results indicate that upregulated expression of bladder and spinal BDNF is involved in the emergence of inefficient voiding in SCI mice. Thus, BDNF-targeting treatment could be an effective modality for the treatment of voiding problems, including inefficient voiding and detrusor sphincter dyssynergia after SCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据