4.7 Article

3D nanoporous crystals enabled 2D channels in graphene membrane with enhanced water purification performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 542, 期 -, 页码 41-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.055

关键词

Graphene; Porous nanocrystals; Membranes; Water purification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21490585, 21476107, 21406107]
  2. Innovative Research Team Program by the Ministry of Education of China [IRT13070]
  3. Topnotch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TAPP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) materials have been received increasing attention in various fields such as physics, material science, chemistry and engineering. In particular, the graphene-based membrane is an emerging subject mainly due to the atomic thickness, simple processing and the compatibility with other materials. In the case of water treatment, stable graphene-based laminar structures as well as high separation performance are pursued. In this work, nanoporous crystals embedded graphene laminate membranes was reported for water purification. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheets obtained from a solution chemical process act as building blocks to construct the 2D channels through a pressure-driven filtration process. By incorporating three-dimensional (3D) nanoporous crystals with sub-nano sized aperture size into the 2D graphene laminates, both the inter-layer spacing and numbers of nanofluidic channels are increased, leading to greatly-enhanced water separation performance. The optimized 3D/2D membranes exhibit 15 times higher water permeability than that of the rGO membrane with similar high dye retention rate. The significance of such 3D nanoporous structure and transport mechanism through the 3D/2D membranes is systematically studied. This general approach of enhancing the molecular transport through 2D nanofluidic channels proposed here may also find application in gas separation and battery membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据