4.7 Article

Construction of TiO2@graphene oxide incorporated antifouling nanofiltration membrane with elevated filtration performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 533, 期 -, 页码 279-288

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.03.040

关键词

Graphene oxides; TiO2; Nanofiltration; Interfacial polymerization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21376225, 21476215]
  2. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [16HASTIT004]
  3. Excellent Youth Development Foundation of Zhengzhou University [1421324066]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC) of the Ministry of Education, P.R. China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) graphene-based nanomaterials of atomic thickness have opened a new era for fabricating membranes with outstanding performance. In this work, a novel graphene oxide (GO) based thin film nanocomposite membrane for nanofiltration (NF) was constructed. Taking advantage of the nanochannels between graphene oxide, TiO2 nanoparticles were introduced between these GO nanosheets to form a TiO2@ GO nanocomposite with dilated and stable nanochannels. The TiO2@ GO incorporated membranes was prepared by interfacial polymerization of piperazine (PIP) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) monomers and embedding TiO2@ GO nanocomposite in its polyamide layer. The effects of the embedded nanoparticles on the physicochemical properties of the prepared membranes, and on the NF membrane performance were investigated. The superior performance of the TiO2@ GO incorporated membranes was observed in the case of 0.2 wt% TiO2@ GO with water flux of 22.43 L m(-2) h(-1) at 0.4 MPa and Na2SO4 rejection of 98.8%. This represents an enhancement in permeate flux by a factor 2 compared to a pristine membrane, and 5 times higher than the GO modified membrane, only with a slight compromise in the solute rejection. In addition, the introduction of the TiO2@ GO endows the modified TFN membranes with an improved antifouling effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据