4.7 Article

Interaction energy and competitive adsorption evaluation of different NOM fractions on aged membrane surfaces

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 542, 期 -, 页码 195-207

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.08.020

关键词

PVDF membrane ageing; Natural organic matter (NOM); XDLVO theory; Membrane fouling behaviors; Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51638011, 51378349, 51578374]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT-17R80]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Tianjin, China [15PTSYJC00230, 14ZCDGSF00128, 16PTGCCX00070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural organic matter (NOM) plays a key role in membrane fouling, especially in irreversible fouling. Different PVDF membrane aging degrees lead to variations in the chemical/physical properties of membrane which further affect membrane permeability and fouling behavior. In the present work, the interaction energy between foulants and membranes with different ageing degrees was assessed by the extended Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (XDLVO) theory, using bovine albumin serum (BSA), sodium alginate (SA) and humic acids (HA) as model foulants. Fluorescence labeling and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was applied to characterize the distribution rule of binary foulants formed on membrane surfaces. The calculation of CLSM images via COMSTAT could quantify each foulant distribution in the fouling layer, which provides insights on combined fouling mechanisms. Results showed that membrane ageing modifies NOM fouling behaviors in according to the degree of ageing. Furthermore, filtration of the SA/BSA mixtures showed that BSA was first absorbed on the membrane surface in a competitive environment, which then plays a bridge role in promoting the SA to form a denser cake layer on the membrane. That is to say, different ageing degrees mainly affected the attachment of BSA to the membrane surface with regard to mixture of organics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据