4.7 Article

Ion transport and electrochemical stability of strongly basic anion-exchange membranes under high current electrodialysis conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 526, 期 -, 页码 60-72

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.12.028

关键词

Anion-exchange membrane; Water splitting; Electroconvective instability; Rotating membrane disk; Laser interferometry

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [14-13-00882]
  2. RFBR [15-08-05031, 16-38-00572mol_a, 16-48-230364r_a]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [14-13-00882] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rotating membrane disk and laser interferometry methods were used to study the mechanism of ion transport, hydrodynamic instability at the solution/membrane interface and electrochemical destruction of strongly basic homogeneous (AMX), heterogeneous (MA-41) and modified heterogeneous (MA-41M) membranes in sodium chloride solutions under intensive current regimes. Electrochemical destruction of strongly basic membranes AMX and MA-41 at current densities above limiting diffusion current is accompanied by conversion of fixed quaternary ammonium groups into weakly basic secondary and tertiary amines. The corresponding increase in the water splitting reaction leads to an increase in the transport number of hydroxide ions, a decrease in the convective instability region thickness and a reduction in the transfer of salt ions. The properties of MA-41M membranes (in which ammonium bases in the surface layer are replaced by quaternary amines, bidentate bonded to the polymer matrix) during testing at overlimiting current regimes remain stable: the partial currents of hydroxide ions are close to zero, and the mass transfer through the modified membrane under intensive current regimes is close in magnitude to the mass transfer through the homogeneous membrane AMX. At the same time, electroconvection becomes the dominant mechanism for the transfer of salt ions through the modified heterogeneous membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据